S&T to Play Critical Role for Homeland Security Department

(originally published in the SSTI Weekly Digest
A Publication of the State Science and Technology Institute)

Participants of the Federal Biodefense Research FY 2003 Conference recently held in Washington D.C. were given the opportunity to see how the new Department of Homeland Security (DHS) will work. With its passage in November 2002 by congressional legislation, the Homeland Security Act that created DHS initiated the largest reorganization of the federal government since the 1950s. Now, several agencies and departments will be affected by DHS, and each figures to have an important role in the biodefense arena. Below are a few highlights of the conference, which was sponsored by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Research America, a nonprofit organization that promotes health and medical research, and The Scientist, an online news journal.

S&T Role
John Marburger, Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, gave the keynote on the first day of the conference, stressing the important role that S&T will play in both DHS and biodefense.

The structure of the newly created DHS includes a directorate of science and technology that will be headed by an under secretary for science and technology, Marburger noted. This under secretary will advise the DHS secretary on R&D efforts, priorities, goals, objectives and policies. With this type of involvement, Marburger said, OSTP and the S&T community will have a direct line in the creation of S&T functions within the DHS. One of the members of the presidential appointed transition team for DHS is from OSTP, he added.

The new department also calls for the creation of a 20-member Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee. With a goal of highlighting issues important to the nation's security, this committee will provide an annual report that will seek to shed light on critical research areas and other initiatives.

During his keynote, Marburger addressed The National Strategy for Homeland Security, which outlines six critical mission areas in which S&T will be vital: intelligence and warning; border and transportation security; domestic counterterrorism; protecting critical infrastructure and key assets; defending against catastrophic threats; and emergency preparedness and response.

Released in July 2002, the strategy also outlines 11 major initiatives specifically aimed at S&T:

Develop chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear countermeasures;
Develop systems for detecting hostile intent; Apply biometric technology to identification devices; Improve the technical capabilities of first responders;
Coordinate research and development of the homeland security apparatus;
Establish a national laboratory for homeland security; Solicit independent and private analysis for science and technology research; Establish a mechanism for rapidly producing prototypes; Conduct demonstrations and pilot deployments;
Set standards for homeland security technologies; and Establish a system for high-risk, high-payoff homeland security research.

The National Strategy for Homeland Security is available in its entirety at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/homeland/book/.