
Patent
Protection
August
26, 2002
by
Wendy Hall,
Larta Staff Writer
With
the potential of creating much-needed revenue streams and
erecting barriers to entry, intellectual property (IP) is
no longer just another asset in the tumultuous tech economy,
but constitutes a vital business strategy.
For
entrepreneurs and tech startups trying to either attract
capital or gain market share, patented assets have become
one way for new businesses with little track record to gauge
both value and viability in its chosen marketplace. Thus,
the management of IP has become a considerable priority
for emerging companies as well as established corporations
trying to locate untapped revenue sources. This priority
shift is reflected in the rate of patent applications that
have been filed since the beginning stages of the current
economic downturn. According to Forbes magazine, the annual
growth rate of the number of IP applications rose from an
average of 8% (during the 90s) to 12% in 2000 and 2001,
while biotech applications alone saw a 24% increase during
that time frame.
"I would assume that the main reason for the increase
in filing is because companies are coming to see patents
as a more valuable asset," says Michael Kreiger, a
patent attorney and speaker at the upcoming Larta University
workshop
on intellectual property.
The
bulk of the market capitalization in many companies is now
a series of intangible assets, says Kreiger. Because these
assets aren't reflected in accounting reports (a current
concern of the SEC in light of recent corporate scandals),
IP has become one of the few assets that is tangible, and
thus plays a major role in determining a company's stock.
For most entrepreneurs seeking capital to grow a tech business,
patented assets are also crucial in the initial marketing
stages because it can convey to a potential investor that,
"you at least know enough to think about patents. A
decent potential patent is very important to providing a
competitive advantage or barrier to entry against potential
competitors."
Despite the importance of IP for a startup tech company,
many entrepreneurs mistake a successful patent application
as providing an umbrella of protection against not only
a venture capital drought, but unforeseen circumstances
such as market development cycles, shrinking lead times,
changing legal interpretations, and-- one of the most common
conflicts for tech companies--conflicting patents. Because
of the vastness of the number of tech and science patent
applications, a patent approved does not insure that there
are no other already-licensed innovations that don't conflict
with it. The patent search, which the US Patent and Trademark
Office conducts during the application process, attempts
to remedy the problem of rivaling properties, but because
of the vastness of the number of applications and the rapid
change taking place inside these fields, it is inherently
flawed. Thus a company does not relinquish its responsibility
of understanding market competition by being afforded patent
protection.
"Presumably the entrepreneur understands the market
they're in and understands whether they're treading on toes,"
Kreiger says. "One of the things about technological
innovation is having something that's a new idea or a new
discovery or application of a discovery, and really knowing
about your field is what's going to tell you that you're
the first."